Skip navigation and jump to main content
Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting
COOLUM 2002 SEARCH
What is the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting? Fact Sheets Classroom Publications Media Information Delegate Information About Australia
 

 

Media Conference Solomon Islands

Media Conference: Solomon Islands
Media Centre Conference Room
Speakers: Sir Kemakeza
Tuesday, 5 March 2002

SIR KEMAKEZA: I will allow the media to ask any questions that they may wish to ask. If I have the answers, I will give the answers. If I have to find some answers, I will find some answers later. Now it is open for you to ask any questions that you would like to ask.

QUESTION: We understand that greenhouse emission issues and global warming issues were raised today at some length on behalf of the low-lying atoll island states. Who spoke, and what were the points that were raised? Was there criticism of Australia's agreement with the United States in relation to greenhouse issues?

SIR KEMAKEZA: Thank you. It is a very good question. In fact, this has not come into the agenda originally. During the course of the deliberations of the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting, the issue was brought up by the small states. It has been included in the Coolum Communique. That is an amendment given to the small states in respect of it. I will quote what has been put in. It is 'Heads of government express concern about the consequences of global warming and climate change, especially for the vulnerable small island states and other low-lying islands in the small states.' That has been taken care of in the Coolum Communique. Thank you.

QUESTION: What did the small states say? What points did they make about that? They were the other parts of the question.

SIR KEMAKEZA: I cannot relay what Australia's position is. I can only say that that has been brought up during the deliberations of the small states. It has been taken on board, as I said earlier.

QUESTION: What did the small states say?

SIR KEMAKEZA: Because the heads of the Commonwealth government who have been represented have seen the importance of this very sensitive issue, for some - especially industrial countries, those of us who come from the small states thought it should be included in the communique.

QUESTION: I understand that you had a bilateral talk with the Prime Minister of Papua New Guinea. Have you had an opportunity to talk about the issue of Bougainvillea and criminal activities in the Solomon Islands territory?

SIR KEMAKEZA: Yes. I had a bilateral discussion with the Prime Minister of Papua New Guinea, Sir Morauta. We have also discussed within our agenda the border issue between Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands. That has been discussed at length. We agreed that the officers will take it on from here to look at the pros and cons of this border issue after the discussion with me or my discussion with the Prime Minister of Papua New Guinea.

QUESTION: Is it possible that the Bougainvilleans will be sent back to Bougainville? Do you see that as a possible option?

SIR KEMAKEZA: The border between Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands is a traditional border, if I go back to history. Therefore, any discussions of any steps that both governments will take must take into consideration the traditions between the people of Bougainville and the people of the Solomon Islands with regard to the criminal activities that are currently going on in this border.

QUESTION: I have another question about the conflict. Your foreign minister told Radio Australia that was he was not concerned about the number of semiautomatic weapons stolen from the police and which are currently in the hands of young Solomon Islanders because they were just young people and at some point they would get over it. Do you agree with his position on the handing in of weapons?

SIR KEMAKEZA: This issue is a more delicate issue. Let me assure the media that, before I left my country, I had these issues clear in my mind to discuss within the Commonwealth service bilaterally with my counterparts in the Commonwealth as well as the forum secretariat. That is restoring peace, balancing our budget, reviving the productive sector, managing our debts and re-engaging with the donor community.

As far as the weapons are concerned in the Solomon Islands, they are probably in prohibition of the Townsville peace agreement that the disarmament program has to be carried out. It has been an ongoing program, though very little activities have been realised. But that does not stop my government from pursuing this program, taking into account a lot of costs pre-empting the review of the Townsville agreement.

QUESTION: I return to the issue of climate change and the communique. The communique says that there is an expression of concern. Does that go far enough? Have you been in touch with other Pacific Island states? Would they have liked a stronger expression or something more concrete about climate change in the communique?

SIR KEMAKEZA: This issue, as I said earlier on, has been delegated to what they call a group of small states action group so that they can take this issue further in the future discussions, especially in other forums or next year's Commonwealth meeting.

QUESTION: In an interview with the Prime Minister of Vanuatu, Mr Natapei, he suggested that the Solomon Islands use its duty system to try to get the militants to get the young people to surrender their weapons. He said that one of the observers from Vanuatu who came to observe the elections saw the need for the Solomon Islands to involve your chiefs in trying to get the militants to return their weapons and also for reconciliation. Do you think that suggestion is valid?

SIR KEMAKEZA: The issue of the election has been part of the Coolum Communique. I am very happy for the endorsement of the heads of the Commonwealth. That is the greatest achievement of my delegation, that this issue has become part of the communique. Clause 15 of the communique says, in relation to your question, 'The heads of the government welcome the recent national parliament election in the Solomon Islands and acknowledges the role of regional governments for in assisting with the conduct of this election.' They express the plight of the government of the Solomon, noting that much remains to be done to consolidate peace and stability. Heads of the government recommended the role of the international peace monitors, led by Australia and New Zealand, in overseeing the peace process and agreed that the recognition of the difficulties in the country of the Solomon Islands should continue to be among the agendas for purposes of promoting good governance, peace and stability and economic developments for countries. In this context, I am happy that this is the process of reconstructing my country in both economics as well as the peace process.

QUESTION: A suggestion was made by the Prime Minister of Vanuatu that the Solomon Islands could use our system that we have in Fiji. We have a Council of Chiefs in Fiji. They could resolve the problems you have at home in terms of the military returning their weapons or getting the young people to be part of the whole reconciliation process.

SIR KEMAKEZA: I thank the Prime Minister of Vanuatu for this suggestion. There is a program within my government to use traditional leaders - and not only traditional leaders but also the churches. It is also the members of the churches and tribes who are involved to assist the government to bring back the arms that are with them and their communities. Yes, this is a very worthwhile suggestion by the Prime Minister of Vanuatu. We are looking very seriously at that approach.

QUESTION: When you were referring before to Bougainvilleans involved in criminal activities, what criminal activities were you referring to? Did they include the deaths of two people recently in western province? My second question relates to compensation payments. Will there be future compensation payments related to ethnic strife? What efforts are being taken to avoid the abuses and corruption that took place in the past in relation to those payments?

SIR KEMAKEZA: The peace process has gone through a lot of stages. That is from the cease-fire to the arguments that the government of the past administration as well as this administration is concerned with. That is the Townsville Peace Agreement as well as the Marou Peace Agreement. That binds all parties together. The isolated cases that are happening - we treat them as criminal activities. Young people are using the situation for that purpose. They are demanding money as well as attacking lives. That is what has happened to the Western province where two lives were taken.

In terms of compensation from the international communities or foreign governments, this is not an issue. But in the Melanesian context, that is the way they settle their differences. It may not go down well in other parts of the world, but it has a great significance to those in Melanesia. Therefore, the Western governments have focused on the issue because of the sensitivity of the killing. There is consideration by the provincial government of the Western province, which is part of the Solomon Islands. They considered it along those lines.

QUESTION: I have one further question about the payments. The last question referred to the donation given by the Republic of Taiwan. It appears to have been spent rather quickly and with no accountability. Do you agree with that criticism of the way in which the compensation payments were made? Will that occur again if further international aid goes into the Solomons?

MR KEMAZEZA: I cannot speak for the past administration. My administration takes into account that issue. It is putting in mechanisms to ensure accountability and transparency.

QUESTION: How useful do you think the Commonwealth meetings like CHOGM are for the Solomon Islands and its people in light of some critiques saying that the organisation has outlived its purpose?

MR KEMAZEZA: This has been a learning experience for me. This is the first time I have attended such a big forum. As you know, I was elected to become Prime Minister of the Solomon Islands just two months ago. Meeting leaders from 45 countries in the Commonwealth and explaining to them our problems and aspirations is a good thing for the Solomon Islands. It is only then that we can express our needs. It is only when you are aware of someone's problems that you become sympathetic. It is about how I should attend this very important forum to inform the Commonwealth and to inform members of the situation my country is going through at the moment.

QUESTION: Are the leaders aware of what you experience in the Solomon Islands?

MR KEMAZEZA: I think I have given that answer earlier on. Including Solomon Islands into the communique is a big step forward for my country.

QUESTION: Would you agree that there have been some gross abuses and corruptions that have taken place in the past in relation to the distribution of compensation funds, including that large amount of money that came from Taiwan and went to prominent people in the Solomon Islands public life? Would you agree that those gross abuses and corruptions have damaged the Solomon Islands' international standing with the donor community to such an extent that it will be hard to repair?

MR KEMAZEZA: That is an over-exaggeration of the media, this idea of the abuse and misuse of funds. It singles out the issue that makes overseas people have preferences. It is an area which needs further checking - whether or not these actions were dishonest, or whatever definition you may call it.

QUESTION: Will there be a formal inquiry into those abuses to find out where the money went and whether it was properly received, who received what, what evidence was produced in terms of the substantial damages requiring compensation, who received the money, what paperwork was carried out et cetera? Will you commit your government to a formal inquiry to get to the bottom of that?

MR KEMAZEZA: Of course, yes, a commission of inquiry will be looking to the police. The commissioner is there; the Director of Public Prosecutions is there. We are using all these available avenues to ensure that nobody is getting away without checking.

QUESTION: Could you clarify what you have said: you will set up the commission of inquiry, or there is an inquiry going on at the moment into those payments?

MR KEMAZEZA: It is in the province of the parties. It is also in our program of action for this new government to ensure transparency. There was a call in the parliament for this. Therefore, my government is going to do whatever it can in these inquiries

QUESTION: That is about future action. Will you carry out a thorough investigation of past payments that have been made, including under the terms of the previous government? Will you investigate the previous payments that were made from Taiwan thoroughly?

MR KEMAZEZA: It will be the whole thing - the whole thing that have been carried out before, present and in the future.

QUESTION: Who would you like to see run that inquiry? Who would you like to see heading up that inquiry?

MR KEMAZEZA: It has to be led by a legal person, who has the legal background to carry out these investigations. There would perhaps be people from other countries to do it so that it can be fair and so that there is no suspicion over this very sensitive and delicate issue.

QUESTION: I want to ask another question about the guns. When you became Prime Minister you set a deadline of 100 days for the handing in of all the weapons. It is proving to be extremely difficult to get those weapons handed in. To put it bluntly, when do you expect to have the weapons handed in by?

MR KEMAZEZA: That is a very good question. It is challenging. We put in mechanisms to carry out the disarmament program. The incidents that happened during the process of this disarmament has pulled back the program. For example, there were two killings that happened which slowed down the program. We anticipated it in the first place. However, this does not stop the government from going ahead. I personally went to the coast to meet the Harcor about the continuation of the process of disarmament. If there are no further questions, thank you very much indeed for attending this media conference. I thank you all for your questions and interest. If there are any other questions, do not hesitate to contact us in the Solomon Islands to get more information for anything that may be of interest to you.

ENDS

 


 

 

 

 

 

 
 
O P C SafetyWeb